Proud IBA member here.
Just a couple quick thoughts.
1. Can someone tell me when Ia. changed the law affecting the way nr lo'ers get deer tags?
Law hasn't changed!! So if you bought land and didn't know the law,that's your fault. Not mine.
2. 17 states give res lo no special breaks on big game tags and 9 states have restrictions on big game tags.
3.
34 states give nr lo'ers no break. So someone please tell how or why Ia. is so unfair.
3. Anyone know the stance/position that Ia PF has taken on nrlo issue. Lot more people groups side with the IBA than you think. Main difference is IBA isn't afraid to put it out there for all to see.
4. Finally in 2005 this was passed by Congress
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 731
To reaffirm the authority of States to regulate certain hunting and fishing activities.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 9, 2005
Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. OTTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources
A BILL
To reaffirm the authority of States to regulate certain hunting and fishing activities.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Reaffirmation of State Regulation of Resident and Nonresident Hunting and Fishing Act of 2005'.
SEC. 2. DECLARATION OF POLICY AND CONSTRUCTION OF CONGRESSIONAL SILENCE.
(a) In General- It is the policy of Congress that is in the public interest for each State to continue to regulate the taking for any purpose of fish and wildlife within its boundaries, including by means of laws or regulations that differentiate between residents and non-residents of such State with respect to the availability of licenses or permits for taking of particular species of fish or wildlife, the kind and numbers of fish and wildlife that may be taken, or the fees charged in connection with issuance of licenses or permits for hunting or fishing.
(b) Construction of Congressional Silence- Silence on the part of Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier under clause 3 of Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution (commonly referred to as the `commerce clause') to the regulation of hunting or fishing by a State or Indian tribe.
SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed--
(1) to limit the applicability or effect of any Federal law related to the protection or management of fish or wildlife or to the regulation of commerce;
(2) to limit the authority of the United States to prohibit hunting or fishing on any portion of the lands owned by the United States; or
(3) to abrogate, abridge, affect, modify, supersede, or alter any treaty-reserved right or other right of any Indian Tribe as recognized by any other means, including but not limited to agreements with the United States, Executive Orders, statutes, and judicial decrees, and by Federal law.
SEC. 4. STATE DEFINED.
For purposes of this Act, the term `State' includes the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
5. Memberships to IBA can be bought online at www.iowabowhunters.org
