Search results

How long was the payout after submitting the bill?

Money was shut down less than 1 month. If that's what he's claiming broke him I'm guessing he has much bigger isues! Get your head out of the sand man ! I'm OK with diffence in opion but the lack of any sort of pragmatic decion making is hard to tolerate. It's just too bad Kamala isn't...

That is the exact method the communist would love to use to strip the land from red blooded American land owner!!!! That isn't even a funny bad joke.

THE TRACKER!!!! Dad had 1!

Yup, my dad had that one. watched it many times, there was an old lady that hunted most of the time if I remeber right. That was about the same time they had the string that attached to your bow and then to the arrow and that was how you tracked your kill!

I think you may be on to something here. Not saying i am 100% agreement on all however In my mind this approach does settle a lot of internal civil disputes above....

I'd support the bill as written as well. The one issue I would have is there are a lot of 40s that are short . 39.6 39.3 38.99 I think they should be included as well...

100% support on both bills my way, including aboutb10 buddies of my I have shared these topics with. A couple of those do lose lot tags but ok with it. Did have 1 who was a no on lot tag primarily because he didn't want to lose his tag.

Why 20 acres? Because you then qualify? I have 19. Not fair to me!

I agree with this. The tenant was who this was created for. Even if abused.

Ì stand strong on the fact there def should be an acreage min for a land owner /tenant tag. 2 acres is 295' x295'. Put a stand in the middle of it you can cover every inch of it with a bow! Always thought the min was insane! Even when I only owned 2 acres! I will support every bill that...

Also just emailed in support for both bills and also received an auto reply from Dan. Link is good.

I think you have an excellent handle on the situation. I agree with almost all (scope on muzzy). I dont disagree however those thoughts are not a bill headed to subcommittee. That is more of a wish list. This bill is headed to subcommittee and however it does affect a few LOT tag holders...

Isn't that the whole point of the bill? We have gone too far with our hunting laws and are paying the price for it now. If we don't start trying to turn that around it's not going to get better.... This bill is far from perfect but at least it is headed the right direction.

I gues I must have missed it but in your 6 paragraphs I don't think I saw where anything was good for the resorce?

When I first read this posting this morning I was very dissapointed in the opposition of this bill on this particular website. It is clearly for the greater good of the resource regardless of how it affects you as an individual! Agree with the statement above. That is an excellent point of...

Although I like the floating tag for me. ( It makes hunting decisions much easier) I agree. Would not have voted for it and would vote to remove ASAP if possible.

This seems like the typical me me me. Trump and DOGE is cleaning house in Washington. Cutting friverlous spending everywhere. I 100% support it. They have not gotten to the USDA yet! When they do I'm sure they are gonna take a hatchet to a lot of the programs we hunter/landowners are...

Something said over and over. " I have a 3rd buck tag and don't use it". Why is that? The reality it's because the opportunity does not exhist. If it did they get used. (Opportunity being whatever your personal standard/goal is) I'd say this is not picking on the little guy however aligning...

This was shot by my neighbors kid on his land. They lost it. I found it 2 days later after following up on some birds looking for ehd kills. It was roughly 500 yds from shot site. He shot it with 350 legend. Not 100 % where he hit but doesn't look too far off....