Search results

some one pm'd last night saying that one issue is retroactivity- if a guy is considered a resident for the purposes of hunting and fishing and the state turns around and changes that law, its is illegal?

it says non residents which makes sense or non resident landowners and is their a difference, just asking , i do not know . not a lawyer , i do know this has not come up yet in these appeals

anything related to our court system scares me

A couple of people suggested I create a separate thread to make sure everyone was fully aware of what is most likely coming down the pipe. quite frankly its terrifying no matter how you look at it. As most of you know this year is going to be a pivotal year in the history of deer hunting...

well that was my whole initial point- why are 4 individuals and others being singled out for claiming to be residents when the rich and famous are left alone, like athletes, politicians, big landowner hunters like those mentioned before. if the state is going to crack down, at least be...

my lawyer friend tells me the reason they were able to still hunt is because they have not been charged guilty yet , so when the appeal process is over and the get a decision, they will either in the electronic system as a resident or nr . i asked the same question

i posted something on another chat, but , i will say it again, 6000-12000 is wrong, that is what will creat chaos and mass killing . outfitters , additional commercialization(if thats possible) some guy from new york comes here, pays 3500 dollars doesnt give 2 shyts what he kills, 120-...

just a thought here, we always hear the nr landowners bytch and complain that they cant get tags to hunt their own land. in some cases these people have been spending 5 to 10 k dollars for tags clearly not every nr landowner could afford this but, i question what can they afford, they clearly...

lets try and get some facts straight- these specific 4 individuals were not denied their hunting rights this year. all 4 of these individuals hunted as residents of iowa. this is not a lawsuit against the state it is just an appeal for residency and each is making a separate case because...

correct and each individual has the opportunity to stand in front of the judge and make his or her case for residency- however it seems that these people will not stop, speaking of lawsuits, unconstitional etc,, lawyer mumbo jumbo civil crap and all that will happen in the local courts where...

what we dont realize is this, most of these guys have been here hunting for 5-10 yrs, we are not talking 1 yr , ok, 2 years ago, the law was slightly different. the law said 30 days and you could turn in your state drivers license and get an iowa drivers license, the state has recognized these...

the judge in Monroe county court 2 years ago , already ruled in favor of a guy from new york who owned a big piece of land north of albia. apparently- the game warden was forced to give up his source in the case. its public information, kind of scary- call the warden , give him a tip , you think...

i think the state should charge legitmate nr landowners $1,000 dollars for licenses , apply half back to the dnr, and take the other half and buy up more land for people like me that cannot afford land. i dont know how mannr landowners there are , but... that is a alot of money, make them pay...

let me clarify a few things here, game wardens somehow came up with a list of potential violators(nr landowners supposedly acting as residents ) this happened over the summer. no one knows how this list was out together but none the less individuals received a letter basically asking for proof...

i may be wrong but.... drivers license- registered to vote , and you were good to go. it was 30 and now i hear 90 days . its going to be very difficult to go back, but who knows. i am not a lawyer . they sent letters to people , saying if you want to buy tags here , show us all your...

we are on the same team here, easy trigger- but since tags are fixed at 6000, then actually they are not getting incremental revenue its 6000 x 500 no matter what every year . actually taking away revenue if you assume they are illegaling buying resident tags its my understanding the dnr...

i am not saying nr landowners posing as residents is not wrong, its is very wrong what i am saying is that the dnr is not making any money through this effort. they are targeting specific nr landowners and taking away their ability to buy tags, that is great but.... I would rather see the dnr...

my point is , before you everyone jumps up and congratulate the guy for an awesome deer, and it is awesome, they should stop and think - is this guy a legit resident , because we all spend alot of time on this site talking about ways to keep nr 's from killing our deer, getting more tags, and...

i wonder how much of our tax money the dnr is spending to throw out nr landowners from the state

Maybe it was all legal. but the dnr is currently running 100's of landowners through the burden of proof process under the new nr requirements, i doubt anyone questioned them -