shadowpeople
Active Member
Our local bow club is having a meeting on Wednesday to discuss our target situation for replacements, etc... We are currently at a tipping point where about half or a little less are Rineharts, and the rest are McKenzie's. It would be nice to go to all one or the other, but there is a pretty significant price difference on them, especially the BIG targets.
I suspect many of you are in your local bow clubs, or attend a few 3-D shoots per year, what have your experiences been? Do any of you have any data about longevity, total costs, etc... for one over the other. Obviously Rineharts are more expensive, and I realize you usually get what you pay for. But, if they are 2x as expensive, are they lasting 2x as long? 3x? 1.5x? I would like some opinions from club members, or non club members that attend shoots. Is there really that much difference in arrow removals?
I see that McKenzie has come out with some new materials, like the EZ Flex. Has anyone tried these yet?
Thanks for any input!
I suspect many of you are in your local bow clubs, or attend a few 3-D shoots per year, what have your experiences been? Do any of you have any data about longevity, total costs, etc... for one over the other. Obviously Rineharts are more expensive, and I realize you usually get what you pay for. But, if they are 2x as expensive, are they lasting 2x as long? 3x? 1.5x? I would like some opinions from club members, or non club members that attend shoots. Is there really that much difference in arrow removals?
I see that McKenzie has come out with some new materials, like the EZ Flex. Has anyone tried these yet?
Thanks for any input!