Curious of what kind of racks are in your area and does there seem to be dominating features, attributes, genetics, etc? It seems that as I hunt some parts of the state the genetics are far better than other areas. Even with just a 10 mile drive sometimes. ALMOST everyone I know complains about too many 8 points compared to 10+ points- sound consistent with you too?
One of my areas seems to have tons of fork g-2 bucks or multiple points- many 12-15 pointers, amazing scoring bucks at older ages (even high scorers at young ages- EXAMPLE, we had a 180" 3 year old one time). Another area I hunt I NEVER seen a deer that scored over 160" BUT I do see many mature deer. A 3rd area has a abundance of poor scoring bucks that max out maybe 140-150 on average.
When we're talking major differences on scores, size, points, mass, etc in certain areas that ALL contain mature deer- do you all feel it's mainly genetic, do you feel like there's vast nutrition differences, a combo, what???
One theory I have with nutrition- when I get into areas with bigger rolling hills, more pasture, less crop and the absence of that rich river bottom ground- I notice the quality/score of bucks is far less. VS When I hunt the rich, flat river bottom areas they seem to contain far more "high scorers", extra points, splits, junk and mass, likely due to all the extra minerals and nutrients in soil. (even generally poor soil counties have rich river bottom land in areas). Does anyone else notice this? *Too many deer obviously can hurt growth and habitat/nutrition
What's the story with your area- high or low scoring mature bucks? Examples too like: wide bucks with short tines, narrow tall buck with mass, drop tines, non-typicals, lots of 8 points, etc. Do your bucks seem to max out at a certain range in your area (for example- you've never seen a mature buck over 170" or WHATEVER) How does that relate to genetics and nutrition in your area? What is your area like for terrain, nutrition, crops, crop land quality, etc?
One of my areas seems to have tons of fork g-2 bucks or multiple points- many 12-15 pointers, amazing scoring bucks at older ages (even high scorers at young ages- EXAMPLE, we had a 180" 3 year old one time). Another area I hunt I NEVER seen a deer that scored over 160" BUT I do see many mature deer. A 3rd area has a abundance of poor scoring bucks that max out maybe 140-150 on average.
When we're talking major differences on scores, size, points, mass, etc in certain areas that ALL contain mature deer- do you all feel it's mainly genetic, do you feel like there's vast nutrition differences, a combo, what???
One theory I have with nutrition- when I get into areas with bigger rolling hills, more pasture, less crop and the absence of that rich river bottom ground- I notice the quality/score of bucks is far less. VS When I hunt the rich, flat river bottom areas they seem to contain far more "high scorers", extra points, splits, junk and mass, likely due to all the extra minerals and nutrients in soil. (even generally poor soil counties have rich river bottom land in areas). Does anyone else notice this? *Too many deer obviously can hurt growth and habitat/nutrition
What's the story with your area- high or low scoring mature bucks? Examples too like: wide bucks with short tines, narrow tall buck with mass, drop tines, non-typicals, lots of 8 points, etc. Do your bucks seem to max out at a certain range in your area (for example- you've never seen a mature buck over 170" or WHATEVER) How does that relate to genetics and nutrition in your area? What is your area like for terrain, nutrition, crops, crop land quality, etc?