[ QUOTE ]
how long would it be before we had a deer decoy that walked grunted and peed.
[/ QUOTE ]
If I had any technology skills, I think I would build one of these. I'd sell the hell out em!
I agree, somewhat, but where does the line get drawn. If ethics or primative bow hunting is the issue, a peeing deer decoy would make little difference. Climbing stands, scents, calls, and advanced FOOD PLOT technologies have already moved deer hunting into a different category.
I think the advancement in bows has made archery hunting a far more ethical sport. With the vast number of hunters think of the number of deer that would be crippled today if we were still only using stick bows. Although many of us(actually most) have bows capable of killing at 50 yards, I believe most bow hunters hunt for the challenge of harvesting a nice deer at extremely close range and still harvest game within 20 or 25 yards.
I, my opinion only, feel that harvesting a buck, or doe for that matter,with a bow and other advanced technology is still much more of a challenge than having one come running by during a drive and shooting with a gun! Personally, I enjoy seeing deer in a natural habitat.
My point (as I am rambling as well) is, where is the line to be drawn? We are already miles beyond the Primative bowhunting point!