B
Brad O'Bryan
Guest
Is it me or does this seem a bit fishy?
According to the Iowa DNR non-resident draw policy, “The license drawing for Any-Deer licenses will be made from the pool of applicants with the most preference points and continue to pools with successively fewer preference points until quotas are filled or all applicants have received an Any-Deer license.”
The “pool” approach (which I’m very familiar with), as described above, means that ALL applicants with one preference point will receive a tag before ANY applicants with zero preference points receive a tag.
In looking to see what Greg Miller drew I scrolled down the “Millers” and located Ronald Miller from Valliant, OK who was denied a bow tag for zone 6 and now shows as holding 2 preference points. That means he must have had one pref. pt. going into the draw. Now, I hunt in zone 6 (I drew this year with one point) and I know how popular the zone is so it wasn’t surprising to learn that a few unlucky hunters failed to draw a bow tag (what with the bow cap and everything) even though they held a preference point. Of course that would mean that NOBODY with zero preference points could have drawn a zone 6 bow tag.
Now for the confusing part. I also checked to see if Eddie Salter (another Hunter’s Specialties pro-staffer) drew, knowing full well that he not only bowhunted Iowa last year but also shot a buck there as documented in Primetime 6 which was filmed during the fall of 2001. That would mean that Eddie could not have had a preference point entering the 2002 draw. To my amazement I found that Eddie was “awarded” a bow tag for zone 6…….the very tag for which Ronald Miller (who held one preference point) was denied.
Now, I got my tag so it doesn’t matter much to me but if I were Ronald Miller I’d be rather “pissed” about this situation whether it was simply an error in administering the draw or an intentional “conspiracy” to benefit a company that happens to be headquartered in Iowa.
I don’t want to imply anything so don’t read too much into my message. I think the DNR does a good job with the limited resources they have and I love Hunter’s Specialties products and enjoy their videos. But, either I’m missing something here or something went terribly wrong for a guy like Ronald Miller out there and since you or I could be the next Ronald Miller I thought it was worth raising the issue. Any thoughts?
According to the Iowa DNR non-resident draw policy, “The license drawing for Any-Deer licenses will be made from the pool of applicants with the most preference points and continue to pools with successively fewer preference points until quotas are filled or all applicants have received an Any-Deer license.”
The “pool” approach (which I’m very familiar with), as described above, means that ALL applicants with one preference point will receive a tag before ANY applicants with zero preference points receive a tag.
In looking to see what Greg Miller drew I scrolled down the “Millers” and located Ronald Miller from Valliant, OK who was denied a bow tag for zone 6 and now shows as holding 2 preference points. That means he must have had one pref. pt. going into the draw. Now, I hunt in zone 6 (I drew this year with one point) and I know how popular the zone is so it wasn’t surprising to learn that a few unlucky hunters failed to draw a bow tag (what with the bow cap and everything) even though they held a preference point. Of course that would mean that NOBODY with zero preference points could have drawn a zone 6 bow tag.
Now for the confusing part. I also checked to see if Eddie Salter (another Hunter’s Specialties pro-staffer) drew, knowing full well that he not only bowhunted Iowa last year but also shot a buck there as documented in Primetime 6 which was filmed during the fall of 2001. That would mean that Eddie could not have had a preference point entering the 2002 draw. To my amazement I found that Eddie was “awarded” a bow tag for zone 6…….the very tag for which Ronald Miller (who held one preference point) was denied.
Now, I got my tag so it doesn’t matter much to me but if I were Ronald Miller I’d be rather “pissed” about this situation whether it was simply an error in administering the draw or an intentional “conspiracy” to benefit a company that happens to be headquartered in Iowa.
I don’t want to imply anything so don’t read too much into my message. I think the DNR does a good job with the limited resources they have and I love Hunter’s Specialties products and enjoy their videos. But, either I’m missing something here or something went terribly wrong for a guy like Ronald Miller out there and since you or I could be the next Ronald Miller I thought it was worth raising the issue. Any thoughts?