Buck Hollow Sporting Goods - click or touch to visit their website Midwest Habitat Company

Jim Zumbo's starts to repair what he did

Hoody

New Member
February 28, 2007


Mr. Alan Gottlieb, Chairman
Citizens Committee for the
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

Dear Alan:

They say that hindsight is always 20-20. In my case, hindsight has been a hard teacher, like the father teaching the son a lesson about life in the wood shed.

I was wrong when I recently suggested that wildlife agencies should ban semiautomatic firearms I erroneously called “assault rifles” for hunting. I insulted legions of my fellow gun owners in the process by calling them “terrorist rifles.” I can never apologize enough for having worn blinders when I should have been wearing bifocals.

But unlike those who would destroy the Second Amendment right to own a firearm – any firearm – I have learned from my embarrassing mistake. My error should not be used, as it has been in recent days by our common enemies, in an effort to dangerously erode our right to keep and bear arms.

I would hope instead to use this spotlight to address my hunting fraternity, many of whom shared my erroneous position. I am a hunter and like many others I had the wrong picture in mind. I associated these firearms with military action, and saw not hunting as I have known it, not the killing of a varmint, but the elimination of the entire colony. Nothing could be further from the truth, but I know from whence it comes. This ridiculous image, formed in the blink of an eye, exerts and unconscious effect on all decisions that follow. In seeking to protect our hunting rights by guarding how we are seen in the public eye, I lost sight of the larger picture; missed the forest for the trees.

My own lack of experience was no excuse for ignoring the fact that millions of Americans – people who would share a campfire or the shelter of their tent, and who have hurt nobody – own, hunt with and competitively shoot or collect the kinds of firearms I so easily dismissed.

I recently took a “crash course” on these firearms with Ted Nugent, to learn more about them and to educate myself. In the process, I learned about the very real threat that faces all American gun owners.

I’ve studied up on legislation now in Congress that would renew and dangerously expand a ban on many types of firearms. The bill, HR 1022 sponsored by New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, is written so broadly that it would outlaw numerous firearms and accessories, including a folding stock for a Ruger rifle. I understand that some of the language could ultimately take away my timeworn and cherished hunting rifles and shotguns as well as those of all American hunters.

The extremist supporters of HR 1022 don’t want to stop criminals. They want to invent new ones out of people like you and me with the simple stroke of a pen. They will do anything they can to make it impossible for more and more American citizens to legally own any firearm.

Realizing that what I wrote catered to this insidious attack on fellow gun owners has, one might say, “awakened a sleeping giant within me, and filled him with a terrible resolve.”

I made a mistake. But those who would use my remarks to further their despicable political agenda have made a bigger one. I hope to become their worst nightmare. I admit I was wrong. They insist they are right.

Enclosed, you will find a check that is intended to be used to fight and defeat HR 1022. I also hope it inspires other gun owners to “do as I do, not as I say.”

I’m putting my money where my mouth should have been, and where my heart and soul have always been. I know the Second Amendment isn’t about hunting and never has been. My blunder was in thinking that by working to protect precious hunting rights I was doing enough. I promise it will never happen again.

I don’t know what lies over the horizon for me. I am not ready for the rocking chair.

I’m going to devote every ounce of my energy to this battle. I will remind my fellow hunters that we are first, gun owners. Whether we like it or not, our former apathy and prejudices may place that which we love, hunting, in jeopardy. I will educate fellow outdoorsmen who mistakenly think like I talked, even if I have to visit every hunting camp and climb into every duck blind and deer stand in this country to get it done. I was wrong, and I’m going to make it right.


Sincerely,
Jim Zumbo



Like him or not, that is a powerful letter!

Hoody
 
not good enough. he had better dedicate the rest of his life to keeping the second amendment intact. a check and some empty promises mean little. i think he is just trying to calm people down, until they forget what a tool he is. we'll see how hard he is fighting in a couple years
 
true tool.
grin.gif
I am glad he did make an effort though, whether it is meaningless or not. I never liked him before his comment.

I would compare his show to the GOLD FEVER show. BORING!!

gogogogogog fefififififif gogogogogoo fefififi I got metal detectors up the ol ying yang, blah blah bla
grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everyone ready for round two?
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
My thoughts exactly!
shocked.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
I bet Remington came at Jim like a Spyder monkey and did a bicycle kick to the back of his head.
 
I'm still po'd at him...but it is time to move on. If he has learned from his mistake and can upgrade his 2A knowledge I'm ready to let it go and get back to fighting the real villains.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everyone ready for round two?
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
My thoughts exactly!
shocked.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

grin.gif
 
Well folks I guess that I'll jump in. First off I reviewed the previous thread which I can no longer seem to locate. So forgive me if I don't quote properly as I go from memory. First off someone said that hunting is a privilege not a right and that the Constitution doesn't guarantee the right to hunt. The Federalists Papers which were used before the Constitution was ratified to explain it disagree. Hunting is a right as the "King's deer" no longer exists and every colonist that became a citizen was guaranteed that the wildlife belonged to the people and not to the government. So if I own a deer is it a privilege to possess what I own? Driving by the way is also a right. Our rights have been chipped away as our theory of relativism to be the context of the Constitution is used to modify it without the amendment process. States define both hunting and driving as privileges and take them away as punishment. No on to Mr. Zumbo's. I have shot the M-I and loved it. However as an old timer it reminded me of war and the guys who died using that very rifle. I have totally different feelings seeing someone carrying an implement of war compared to what I perceive as a hunting rifle. The muzzle loader that I love to shoot was used in the Indian wars but it doesn't make me stop and think the way an M-1 does. Why? I grew up watching Dan'l Boone. I associate it not with war but with exploring and settling the West. Yet it was used in many an armed conflict. Our emotions sometimes have nothing to do with logic yet their effect on us might even be more powerful. The Aks and ARs have become a symbol of war to many people. This has absolutely nothing to do with their MOA capacity. The final line in all of this is that logic and fact must be the criteria not emotionalism. Today this is a scary proposition as so many people seem to go by symbolism over substance. The Constitution gives us the right to be stupid. Not only that but the Constitution gives the people the power to rule. The Constitution demands that we have to trust the people, the individual to do what is right. If the 2nd Amendment is designed to allow the People to rebel against an unjust government then the people are allowed to have whatever armament the government has. This is why private individuals of the colonies had cannons on their own privately owned warships. These ships in their day would be our equivalent of an aircraft carrier. Today most of us don't want our neighbor to have the capacity to fight and possibly win against the government which is We the People. This tension is how our rights have been slowly eroded over the years. I don't know the answer to all this but I do know that as far as firearms are concerned that we have to fight against any legislation to restrict them any further. The one shot 50 cal is now under attack and there is legislation to ban it. So single shots are on the list to be taken away. Where will it end? In a fight as desparate as this one we can't afford to shoot our wounded. I have read Mr. Zumbo most of my life. I take his comments just as he said they were. His emotionalism and ignorance combined to produce a wound to our side but even more to him. I'm not interested in revenge or punishment. I am interested if he is for us or against us. I believe that he is for us. So I'll give him a second chance and watch closely. We need to stop the bleeding and go on. Before we judge him too harshly perhaps we should discuss how we have warred among ourselves over modern inlines compared to traditional muzzys? "I don't care what you hunt (shoot) with if it's legal and you're safe with it" must become our common ground. We will not change the mind of our enemies. We must defeat them by our strength of purpose. The 13 colonies had to unite to win and so do we.
 
Well said pastor. I wanted to post something along those lines but it wouldn't have sounded anywhere near as good as that.

So everyone that's P.O.ed at Zumbo needs to refocus that energy towards the ACLU or some other group that wants to destroy our country.
 
I bet Remington came at Jim like a Spyder monkey and did a bicycle kick to the back of his head.

[/ QUOTE ] Thank you 8 lb. 6 oz. baby Jesus.
 
[ QUOTE ]

I bet Remington came at Jim like a Spyder monkey and did a bicycle kick to the back of his head.

[/ QUOTE ] Thank you 8 lb. 6 oz. baby Jesus.

[/ QUOTE ]
grin.gif


hunton all4s
 
Top Bottom