Casper16k
Here is the problem as I see it. You are new here but your first post is one asking how to get arround a regulation, which most of us on here support, for your own personal gain or gratifacation. I don't mean this to be rude or hostle in any way, but more informational. Your comments about not wanting to only be able to hunt the property every two or three years and looking for a way arround the NR draw system is both inaccurate and offensive to us, the residents who have supported the DNR's regulations that have given us better deer hunting than you DNR's regs have given you. First you CAN hunt the property each and every year as long as you are willing to buy the licenses for anterless deer. Your inaccurate statement actually meant that you want to shoot bucks every year, so to me that means that you don't care about or see any value in hunting does only.
The second thing is Iowa's DNR must be doing a pretty good job with the deer hunting and the regulations guarding it, or else why would you even consider buying land here? I also believe that there is a difference in the way Wisconsin and Iowa regulate and protect their deer herds. Thank goodness that we haven't seen the problems with CWD that Wisconsin has, but I think that at least part of that is due to our regulations on things like baiting and game farms, more of the regulations that we here support. The old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it does pretty much hold true reguarding Iowa's deer hunting program, and especially with the NR regualtions. If it weren't a little harder to get to hunt here, then the hunting wouldn't be good enough to make you even want to wait 3 years to hunt here instead of your own home state.
I guess that you know the rules and are considering buying land any way, so I would ask that you respect the rules enough to not try to find a "Way arround the NR drawing system". I know that it is a general trend in our society to try to get arround the laws we don't agree with or to think they should only apply to everyone else, but that attitude has never served us very well now has it?