Sligh1, I hear your rebuttal and will call it a tie since US Marshalls and Nat Guard troops were used as well as local law. But you haven't answered the charge of the invasion of Iraq yet. I'm still waiting for someone to answer the Romney care comments from earlier too.
Any takers?
Ok- so let's even say somewhere in the neighborhood of, what, 1/2 of voters that voted for Bush even agreed with all the Iraq stuff, maybe??? I even do hear both sides of that.... There was no mass weapons of destruction VS multiple intelligence agencies all agreed there was and many prominent democrats voted to invade based on that intell as well. Then you get to- well, at least Sadam is out, a mass murderer & brutal dictator and at least these folks have some level of freedom now where they didn't before. I get all sides of that whole Iraq debate & obviously we could read books & write books on it. IRAQ BOTTOM LINE FOR THIS DISCUSSION.... This was BUSH that did this and that was, what, 10 years ago now?!?!?!? I don't think Bush is running, many major dems voted to do the same, it's been 10 years and there is clearly 2 sides to a huge & complex debate. This is OBAMA vs ROMNEY now, not Bush. Romney did not invade Iraq. Obama has invaded Libya, drone killed lots of terrorists, kept us in Afganistan, etc- did the whole Libya thing without congressional approval which at least Bush DID have that for Iraq. Which I'm not saying I disagree with some of what Obama has done on a few of those things either. Don't disagree with ALL of Obama's stuff & don't agree with all Bush's BUT I sure can't disagree with the invasions Romney has ordered because he hasn't ordered any.
HEALTH CARE..... I seriously couldn't find what you wrote. So- even if some folks disagreed with Romney-care, it was state only & no one said we they agree 100% with any candidate & past. I just say most folks are feeling- hey, in honesty, I agree with Romney on 70% of the issues and Obama on 7% of the issues. I really think that's the bottom line. Continued bottom line with Romney-care: this was the 1st trial, some would say it failed, some say some success- that's what states are for- EXPERIMENTS & state-rights. At least he was the 1st and Obama didn't seem to learn from any mistakes at a state level. Romney also had a, what, 75-85% democrat congress to deal with??? On the flip side, what did Obama do... He actually had a law folks did NOT want in overwhelming majority (vs Romney where most the STATE did want it & sure didn't push it on other states) & bribed people & played every dirty trick in the book to pass obamacare & shove down the throat of the folks that employee him and he works for - who overwhelmingly did not want it and continue to not want it. Why do you think 2010 brought such a huge defeat to the Liberal clowns? Bottom line #1000, Romney says he'll appeal Obamacare - I happen to believe him. Whether he gets enough in congress to get it done, no one knows BUT one of his main platform is repealing or doing anything he can with his office to repeal it and if he lied about that giant promise- he's obviously done- it's too big a promise to go back on. Anything I'm missing on the Romney-care of Mass vs the Obamacare national 1.5 trillion dollar disaster that has doubled in cost from CBO estimates & the country wants thrown out?
*Oh and hey, the title of this thread is RYAN for VP or whatever. Care to make any comparison of Paul Ryan to Joe Biden?!?!?!
**of the 2 candidates & how it pertains to hunting, folks on this site, etc - which candidate you think would have a problem with folks on here "clinging to their guns, bibles & religion"???